PASSAGE-24
The most avid users of social-networking websites may be
exhibitionist teenagers, but when it comes to more grown-up use by business
people, such sites have a surprisingly long pedigree. LinkedIn, an online
network for professionals that signed up its ten-millionth user this week, was
launched in 2003, a few months before MySpace, the biggest of the social sites.
Consumer adoption of social networking has grabbed most attention since then.
But interest in the business uses of the technology is rising. Many companies
are attracted by the marketing opportunities offered by community sites. But
the results can be painful. Pizza Hut has a profile on MySpace devoted to a
pizza-delivery driver called Ted, who helpfully lets friends in on the chain's
latest promotional offers (―Dude, I just heard some scoop from the
Hut, ran one recent post). Wal-Mart started up and rapidly closed
down a much-derided teenage site called The Hub last year. Reuters hopes to do
better with its forthcoming site for those in the financial-services industry.
Social networking has proved to be of greatest value to companies in
recruitment. Unlike a simple jobs board, social networks enable members to pass
suitable vacancies on to people they know, and to refer potential candidates
back to the recruiter. So employers reach not only active jobseekers but also a
much larger pool of passive candidates through referrals. LinkedIn has over 350
corporate customers which pay up to $250,000 each to advertise jobs to its
expanding network. Having lots of people in a network increases its value in a
―super-linear fashion, says Reid Hoffman, LinkedIn's founder. He
says corporate use of his service is now spreading beyond recruiters: hedge
funds use it to identify and contact experts, for example. Jobster, a
Seattle-based social-networking site, is entirely devoted to recruitment.
Jobseekers can post their own profiles and tag their skills; these tags are
then used to match candidates against jobs posted by employers. Unlike on
LinkedIn, companies can set up private networks to ensure that the right kinds
of people are alerted to openings and that the data they post remain under
their control. Information needs to stay behind when a user leaves the company,
argues Jason Goldberg, Jobster's founder. Where LinkedIn emphasises scale and
Jobster emphasises specialisation, Visible Path, a startup based in New York,
focuses on the strength of individual relationships. The firm analyses email
traffic, calendars and diary entries to identify the strongest relationships
that exist inside and outside a company. An obvious application is to generate
leads: a salesman can use the service to identify who within his network has
the closest links to a prospect, and request an introduction. Such techniques
are also gathering momentum in ―knowledge management . IBM recently
unveiled a social-software platform called Lotus Connections, due out in the
next few weeks, that lets company employees post detailed profiles of
themselves, team up on projects and share bookmarks. One manufacturer
testing the software is using it to put inexperienced members of its
customer-services team in touch with the right engineers. It can also be used
to identify in-house experts. Software firms will probably start bundling
social features of this kind into all sorts of business software. To work well
in the business world, social networking has to clear some big hurdles.
Incentives to participate in a network have to be symmetrical, for one thing.
The interests of MySpace members—and of jobseekers and employers—may be
aligned, but it is not clear why commission-hungry salespeople would want to
share their best leads with colleagues. Limiting the size of the network can
reduce its value for companies, yet confidentiality is another obvious concern
for companies that invite outsiders into their online communities. ―Social
networking sounds great in theory, but the business benefits are still unproven,
says Paul Jackson of Forrester, a consultancy. But if who you know really does
matter more than what you know, it has obvious potential.
Question:-
1. What is the author of the passage most likely to agree to?
Option 1 : Social networking has benefited
corporate sector to a large extent.
Option 2 : Social networking is not useful for
corporate sector.
Option 3 : Social networking may benefit the
corporate sector to some extent.
Option 4 : None of these
2. According to the author, how does social networking help
recruitment?
Option 1 : By increasing the reach in a
super-linear fashion.
Option 2 : Making available a larger pool of
passive candidates.
Option 3 : Since enthusiastic teenagers are
also on the network.
Option 4 : None of these
3. Which of the following is an appropriate title for the passage?
Option 1 : Social Networking and Business
Option 2 : Social
Networks
Option 3 : Ethics of Social Networking in Business
Option 4 : Social Networking: Pros and Cons
4. Which of the following statements is Reid Hoffman most likely to
agree to?
Option 1 : Social network is only useful for
recruiting.
Option 2 : Social networking has other uses
apart from recruiting.
Option 3 : Social networking has not impacted
business much.
Option 4 : The prime use of social networking
is for Hedge funds.
5. What meaning of avid could you infer from the passage?
Option 1 :
Dormant Option 2 :
Unprincipled
Option 3 :
Unwanted Option 4 : Enthusiastic
6. What is the most probable context in which the author is talking
about Pizza Hut?
Option 1 : Social networking did not benefit
it.
Option 2 : Social networking was a big success
for it.
Option 3 : Social networking created problems
for it.
4 : None of these
7. Why does the author call Lotus Connections a social software
platform?
Option 1 : Because it is used for knowledge
management.
Option 2 : It has a feature to allow employees
to interact and cooperate with each other.
Option 3 : Because IBM developed it.
Option 4 : Because the service team can get in
touch with the right engineers using it.
8. What are the hurdles that social networking has to overcome in
order to benefit the business world?
Option 1 : Issue of
confidentiality.
Option 2 : Misalignment of interests.
Option 3 : Misalignment of
interests and confidentiality. Option 4 : None of these
Comments
Post a Comment